Nonverbal Communication Essay

AbstractThe goal of this train was to find out if disciplineers were article of faith gestural parley in their distinguishroom, and also if it was important to teach communicative communion in the seg workforcetationroom. Teachers suffer a variety of teaching styles, and techniques. Some teachers using gesturals and some do not. However, sometimes row size, classification take aims, and provokeuality arsehole cause teachers to either use communicatory communication or not. The lift officipants of this study were asked whether or not their teacher use opposite types of communicative communication in the classroom setting. The study set that learners said most teachers in their classes use nonverbal communication to teach. This study also provides support of the importance nonverbal communication has when teaching.Nonverbal communication in the classroomA research some the importance of teaching nonverbal communicationCommunication in world-wide is the process o f sending and receiving piths that enables humans to sh atomic number 18 knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Although we usu totallyy identify communication with speech, communication is composed of two di workforcesions, which are verbal and nonverbal. Nonverbal communication has been be as communication, but just without any words. Communicating is not something we can just do without, nonverbal communication especially considering it can never be shut off, unlike verbal communication we are al shipway communicating nonverbally. One cannot not lead. Nonverbal communication is always around you and impossible to ignore.Research, in many studies, has indicated that nonverbal communication can serve a wide range of functions in human interaction. Nonverbal communication is an essential part of any day life. No matter if at work, school, or even at home, nonverbal communication turn of eventss a huge role in life. As Blatner (2002) says, a good deal people cannot understand the im pact of nonverbal communications involved in a situation unless it is replayed and figured out (pg.3). Teachers need to be practicing and teaching nonverbal communication in the classroom e very(prenominal)day, and that by doing so students ordain become ofttimes better communicators. Nonverbal communication strategies are important to the develop custodyt of an rough-and-ready educational system. Nonverbal communication should be practiced in more classes than just communication classes, because no matter what major of study you are in communication is always going to be an essential thing to know.Many social scientists have conducted research in the field of nonverbal communication as it affects students and educators. Ritchie (1977) found that seven percent of communication is nonverbal. Voice inflection accounts for 38% of the mess fester, and facial expression, including body language, transfers 55% of the message. Speer (1972) states that because 90% of the total impact of a message can come from nonverbal elements, sharpening nonverbal communication skills cannot help but make a person a better communicator. So why are not all teachers using this method of teaching in the classroom setting? That is one of the questions I would like to reaction in my research. This paper will work to determine if nonverbal communication is essential to be taught in the classroom and the importance of the teaching of nonverbal communication.Literature ReviewResearch has been investigated, by many dissimilar scholarly researchers, somewhat nonverbal communication and the importance of why it should be taught to students in their learning career. Nonverbal communication can be defined as signing, symbols, colors, gestures, rhythms, and much more. Those are just a few examples that will be discussed (Ritchie 1977). Speer (1972) believes that it is important to know all the different ways to communicate nonverbally and explains all of those ways in the book. Speer (197 2) also emphasizes on the fact that in order to communicate, you must early know what nonverbal communication in truth is. Pilner, Alloway, & Krames (1974) however compare how humans and animals communicate differently nonverbally and the importance of knowing the different ways, and they also point out how humans and animals can communicate very similarly nonverbally as well. Ethology is the way of studying doings amongst people. Weitz (1974) refers to ethology as a way to conduct research, knowing how to study different peoples behavior is essential to know before observing how people act.Visual interactions are also ways of studying nonverbal communication in the classroom, according to Weitz (1974). agree to Molcho (1985), nonverbal communication is critical in the classroom setting, especially in interpersonal communication. The most credible messages teachers generate are said to be nonverbal. Duggan (2012) discusses all of the different nonverbal cues and why they are impo rtant. For example, he states the importance of facial expressions, gestures, and appearance. Along the same lines Carli (1995), Mayo &Henley (1981) and Thompson (2012) have different articles somewhat differences between men and women and the different thoughts they have on nonverbal communication. He also discusses different research scenarios in which research has been conducted to prove the importance of nonverbal communication, and why men and women communicate differently sometimes.Area of StudyNonverbal communication plays a huge role in the classroom, and how teachers should be using nonverbal communication. (Pliner 1974) This paper is a research intended to help understand why nonverbal communication is so important in teaching, and what those importances are. Teachers should be using nonverbal communication everyday, in every course no matter what the major of study is. I ask to research to see if teachers are using nonverbal communication skills in the classroom enviro nment, and if so how they are using them. My hypothesis is that yes I believe teachers are using nonverbal communication as a way of teaching in their classroom.If the answer is no however, I will research why teachers are not using nonverbal communication in their every day teaching techniques, and if there are reasons behind why they are not using it. I will conduct surveys in class to see if students believe teachers are teaching enough about nonverbal communication, and if they believe it is important to be learning about. I would ask, does nonverbal communication play a role in the classroom? For instance, is nonverbal communication important in the classroom setting, whether it be how the teacher dresses, lectures, stands, etc. I also want to find out if teachers are teaching enough about nonverbal communication to their students. Are students gaining enough knowledge about nonverbal communication turn in the classroom setting? Also, I would like to find out, what is the impo rtance of nonverbal communication. Why should we study this and why do we need to learn this study for our whole careers.Finally, what would a classroom setting be like with zero nonverbal communication? This consists of no eye contact, appearance codes, gesture, or any other(a) kind of nonverbal communication behavior. The following research questions and hypotheses guide the current study H1 Students believe teachers are using nonverbal communication to communicate with them on a daily basis. H2 There is no difference between what males believe teachers use in the classroom and what females believe. H3 All ages believe the same thing when it comes to how very much their teachers communicate nonverbally and how they are communicating this way. RQ1 Does nonverbal communication play a role in the classroom? RQ2 Are teachers teaching enough about nonverbal communication to their students?MethodologyInstrumentI used the convenience type sampling method. (see appendix A) This is a non random type sampling in which I used volunteers in my class to take my survey. The survey contained nine questions. Participants were asked nine questions about how their teachers use different nonverbal communication skills to communicate with them. The students were asked to toller yes or no depending on if the teacher used those certain styles of nonverbals while teaching, Students were also asked some demographic questions sex, classification, and age. I used evidence by Wilmont (1995), about research of nonverbal communication to come up with my research questions. I developed my questions very carefully before choosing what the right questions were to ask. I thought about questions that could be useful to my research and that would help me develop the results I needed in order to prove or disprove my topic. I choose questions that wouldnt be offensive to anyone, so that everyone could participate. I was trying to find out the significance of nonverbal communication being used and taught in the classroom setting.ParticipantsI had twenty-five students in my research communication class participate in my survey. There were fourteen males and eleven females who participated, however gender doesnt have much of an affect on my research. The ages for my survey ranged from nineteen to twenty-three years old. All of the students who took my survey were in some kind of communication field. I conducted my survey and distributed it during our class hour, along with everyone else. I distributed my surveys on Thursday October 18th, 2012.I distributed my survey to each member in the class in a row order. I solely passed my survey out row by row to each class member, and when everyone received my survey they began taking it. When the class was done taking my survey they proceeded to the seem of the classroom and put my surveys in a pile for me to pick up. I then took a look at all of my results later that night. I make an excel document and went through each individua l paper and recorded my results in to excel. I recorded the number of females and males, class rank, and also the answers to my yes and no questions.ResultsThe first hypothesis was concerned with if students believed teachers were using nonverbal communication with them to teach on a daily basis. The hypothesis inferred that students did believe teachers were using nonverbal communication on a daily basis to communicate with them. . This hypothesis was supported. All students answered yes to at least some type of nonverbal communication. The second hypothesis looked at the sex of the students. This hypothesis inferred that the sex of the student was not significant for this survey. This hypothesis was supported. Sex was not significant in the research. Males and females answered mostly the same for every question in the survey.The third hypothesis looked at age of the students. This hypothesis stated that age was not significant in the survey. This hypothesis was supported. After re cording all the results, age was not a factor. All of the students came up with mostly the same answers no matter their age.Research question one asked if nonverbal communication played a role in the classroom setting. From my survey, students believed that yes, nonverbal communication does in fact play a role in the classroom, and the survey also showed that numerous amounts of different types of nonverbal communication are being used every day in the classroom setting. Research question number two asked, are teachers teaching enough about nonverbal communication to their students? The question was answered yes by every single student. Students believe that yes there is enough nonverbal communication being taught in the classroom.DiscussionThe goal of this study was to see if nonverbal communication was being taught in the classroom and if it was important to be taught. Teachers have many different ways of teaching, and many different techniques but the overall outcome was that yes , nonverbal communication is very important in the classroom and that many teachers do use nonverbal communication on a daily basis to teach. Class size, gender, and classification did not really matter in this study. Previous research has also found that nonverbal communication is a very important factor in teaching as well. My study supported previous research, and agreed that nonverbal communication is being taught in the classrooms, and it is important for teachers to teach and use nonverbal communication.Another interest find was that gender did not play a big part in the overall outcomes. I figured since females tend to notice things more, like proximity, gestures, posture, etc., that females would answer a lot differently than males but that was not true in this case. All students believed pretty much the same things.I was not surprised that students believed nonverbal communication was important because I agree, it is. After conducting my survey I versed a lot of things fro m classmates. Some of the things I discovered were, body posture is a very important nonverbal in the classroom. Body posture can tell when students understand the content presented or when they have trouble grasping the major concepts. A student who is slouching in his seat sends a very different message than the student who learns forward or sits erect.I also learned that eye contact plays a very important role in teaching. Teachers a great deal use eye contact in the classroom to decide who is prepared to answer a question, or who has completed a homework assignment. If a student does not want to be called on they will try and have no eye contact with the teacher, and that indicates to the teacher they do not know the answer or wish to not speak. Students also responded that distance is used on a daily basis in the classroom. The teachers are supposed to stand in the front, and the students sit in desks in the middle and back. I also discovered that students would interact more comfortably with a teacher when they are in same vertical plane. Dress being a form of nonverbal communication, I discovered plays a role in every classroom. Teachers dress appropriately for class everyday, as in dress pants, dresses, nice shirts, etc.Effective teaching depends on successful communication. By definition of non-verbal communication without uttering a single word, teachers and students forever and a day send messages to each other (Thompson, 2012).Limits and Future StudyAlthough my study found a lot of reliable information, there were some limitations. When conducting my survey, although it turned out very helpful, I would have changed the questions and been a little more descriptive with them. For example, I would have not only asked if the certain nonverbals were used in the classroom, I would have also asked when and how these forms of communication were used.Another limitation was class classification. There were a wide variety of grade levels that took my survey , and all teachers in every grade level have a different way of teaching, so I would have tried to get maybe all Juniors or all Seniors to take my survey. I would have tried to have all people who take the same classes with the same teachers to take the survey.Future researchers could look more in to how students use nonverbal communication to communicate rather than just teachers. I think students use just as much nonverbal communication as teachers do and that would be an interesting research to conduct also.This research was conducted to show the importance of nonverbal communication while teaching in the classroom. Nonverbal communication plays an essential role in the classroom so I believe more studies should be done concerning nonverbal communication.ReferencesCarli, L. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 68(6), 1030-1041.Duggan, T. (2012). Nonverbal cues between men and women in the workplace. Hearst Newspapers. Re trieved fromhttp//smallbusiness.chron.com/nonverbal-cues-men-women-workplace-11424.html.Key, Mary Ritchie. (1977) Nonverbal communication a research guide & bibliography. Metuchen, N.J. Scarecrow PressMayo, C., & Henley, N. (1981). Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York Springer-Verlag.Molcho, S. (1985). Body speech. New York, NY St. Martins Press.Pliner, P., Alloway, T.,Krames, L. (1974). Nonverbal communication Advances in the study of communication and affect. New York Plenum Press. Speer, D. C. (1972). NonVerbal Communication. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.Thompson, J. (2012). The science and fun of nonverbal communication Electronic Version. Are man and cleaning woman equals in nonverbal communication?Weitz, S. (1974) Nonverbal communication Readings with commentary. New York Oxford University Press.Wilmont, W. (1995). Relational Communication. New York McGraw-Hill.